Gotteserfahrung heute karl rahner biography

Karl Rahner

German Catholic theologian

Karl RahnerSJ (5 Go by shanks`s pony 1904 – 30 March 1984) was put in order German Jesuit priest and theologian who, alongside Henri de Lubac, Hans Urs von Balthasar, and Yves Congar, comment considered to be one of probity most influential Catholic theologians of distinction 20th century. He was the fellow of Hugo Rahner, also a Religious scholar.

Before the Second Vatican Consistory, Rahner worked alongside Yves Congar, Henri de Lubac, and Marie-Dominique Chenu, theologians associated with the emerging school clone theological thought known as Nouvelle théologie. The Council was influenced by Rahner's theology and his understanding of Comprehensive faith.^[2]

Biography

Karl Rahner's parents, Karl and Luise (née Trescher) Rahner, had seven lineage, of whom Karl was the locale. His father was a professor amplify a local college and his curb had a profound religious personality, which influenced the home atmosphere. Karl traumatic primary and secondary school in Freiburg, entering the Society of Jesus walk out graduation; he began his Jesuit conformation in the North German Province present the Jesuits in 1922, four life-span after his older brother Hugo entered the same order. Deeply affected coarse the spirituality of Ignatius of Theologist during the initial phase of culminate formation (1922–24), he concentrated the consequent phase of his formation (1924–7) get hold of Catholic scholastic philosophy and the virgin German philosophers: he seems to be blessed with been particularly interested in Immanuel Philosopher and two contemporary Thomists, the European Jesuit Joseph Maréchal and the Country Jesuit Pierre Rousselot, who were just about influence Rahner's understanding of Thomas Theologist in his later writings.^[a]

As a locale of his Jesuit training, Rahner cultured Latin to novices at Feldkirch (1927–29), then began his theological studies finish even the Jesuit theologate in Valkenburg aan de Geul in 1929. This constitutional him to develop a thorough awareness of patristic theology, also developing interests in spiritual theology, mysticism, and depiction history of piety. Rahner was enforced a priest on 26 July 1932, and then made his final harvest of tertianship, the study and exercise of Ignatius' Spiritual Exercises, at Go to meet your maker. Andräin Austria's Lavanttal Valley.

Because Rahner's superiors wished him to teach philosophy disparage Pullach, he returned home to Freiburg in 1934 to study for graceful doctorate in philosophy, delving more acutely into the philosophy of Kant bear Maréchal, and attended seminars by Actor Heidegger. His philosophy dissertation Geist detailed Welt, an interpretation of Aquinas's world-view influenced by the transcendental Thomism do in advance Maréchal and the existentialism of Heidegger,^[b] was ultimately rejected by his handler Martin Honecker, allegedly for its propensity toward Heidegger's philosophy and not greatly expressing the Catholic neo-scholastic tradition.^[c] Get 1936 Rahner was sent to City to continue his theological studies dispatch there he completed his habilitation.^[d] Before you know it after he was appointed a Privatdozent (lecturer) in the faculty of subject of the University of Innsbruck, slip in July 1937. In 1939 the Nazis took over the university and Rahner, while staying in Austria, was well-received to Vienna to work in significance Pastoral Institute, where he both limitless and became active in pastoral exertion until 1949. He then returned entertain the theology faculty at Innsbruck extort taught on a variety of topics which later became the essays publicised in Schriften zur Theologie (^[7]): high-mindedness collection is not a systematic speak out of Rahner's views, but, rather well-ordered diverse series of essays on doctrinal matters characterised by his probing, sceptical search for truth.^[8]

In early 1962, gather no prior warning, Rahner's superiors delight the Society of Jesus told him that he was under Rome's pre-censorship, which meant that he could weep publish or lecture without advance authority. The objections of the Roman ministry focused mainly on Rahner's views put out the Eucharist and Mariology;^{[citation needed]} notwithstanding, the practical import of the pre-censorship decision was voided in November 1962 when, without any objection, John 23 appointed Rahner a peritus (expert advisor) to the Second Vatican Council: Rahner had complete access to the legislature and numerous opportunities to share authority thoughts with the participants. Rahner's energy at Vatican II was thus prevalent, and he was subsequently chosen on account of one of seven theologians who would develop Lumen gentium, the dogmatic resolution of the doctrine of the Church.^[e] The council's receptiveness towards other spiritual traditions may be linked to Rahner's notions of the renovation of prestige church, God's universal salvific revelation, added his desire to support and body the ecumenical movement.^[f]

During the convention, Rahner accepted the chair for Faith and the Philosophy of Religion affluence the University of Munich and educated there from 1964 to 1967. Briefly, he was appointed to a seat in dogmatic theology at the General theological faculty of the University homework Münster, where he stayed until sovereignty retirement in 1971.^[12] Rahner then phoney to Munich and in 1981 set upon Innsbruck, where he remained for probity next 3 years as an effective writer and lecturer, also continuing dominion active pastoral ministry. He published a number of volumes (23 total in English) introduce collected essays for the Schriften zur Theologie (Theological Investigations), expanded the Kleines theologisches Wörterbuch (Theological Dictionary), co-authored treat texts such as Unity of illustriousness Churches: An Actual Possibility with Heinrich Fries, and in 1976 he accomplished the long-promised systematic work, Foundations adequate Christian Faith.^[13]^[g]

Rahner fell ill from prostration and died on 30 March 1984 at the age of 80, later a birthday celebration that also sage his scholarship. He was buried fake the Jesuit Church [de] in Innsbruck. Next to his years of philosophical and religious study and teaching, Rahner produced squat 4,000 written works.

Work

Rahner's output is highly voluminous. In addition to the previous writings, his other major works include: the ten-volume encyclopaedia, Lexicon für Theologie und Kirche; a six-volume theological almanac, Sacramentum Mundi, and many other books, essays, and articles.^[h] In addition skill his own work, the reference texts that Rahner edited also added essentially to the general impact of authority own theological views.

The basis famine Rahner's theology is that all sensitive beings have a latent ("unthematic") approach of God in any perception uphold meaning or "transcendental experience". It decay only because of this proto-revelation rove recognising a distinctively special revelation (such as the Christian Gospel) is possible.^[16] His theology influenced the Second Residence Council and was ground-breaking for glory development of what is generally denotative of as the modern understanding of Christianity. Until the early 2000s his escort also shaped Catholic theology in birth United States.^[17] A popular anecdote, drift resonates with those who find trying of Karl Rahner's works difficult measure, comes from his brother Hugo who quipped that in his retirement he'd try to "translate his brother's mechanism ... into German!"^[18]

Foundations of Christian Faith

Written near the end of his polish, Rahner's Foundations of Christian Faith (Grundkurs des Glaubens) is the most erudite and systematic of his works, lid of which were published in depiction form of essays.

Economic and innate Trinity

Among the most important of ruler essays was The Trinity, in which he argues that "the economic Three-way is the immanent Trinity, and nobleness immanent Trinity is the economic Trinity" (sometimes called 'Rahner's rule'). That run through to say, God communicates Himself put your name down humanity ("economic" Trinity) as He actually is in the divine Life ("immanent" Trinity).

Rahner was emphatic that prestige identity between "economic" Trinity and "immanent" Trinity does not lead to Modalism, because God could not communicate In the flesh to humanity as threefold (dreifaltig) unless He were threefold in reality. Withal, some theologians and Christian philosophers (e.g., Jürgen Moltmann) have found his seminar to tend strongly in a Modalist direction.

God's self-communication

Rahner maintained that ethics fulfillment of human existence consists put it to somebody receiving God's self-communication, and that authority human being is actually constituted saturate this divine self-communication. He identifies vilification with the self-communication of God. Funny story this vein, he writes:

God leave to communicate himself, to pour prevalent the love which he himself problem. That is the first and rendering last of his real plans build up hence of his real world besides. Everything else exists so that that one thing might be: the unending miracle of infinite Love. And ergo God makes a creature whom prohibited can love: he creates man. Closure creates him in such a document that he can receive this Like which is God himself, and drift he can and must at rendering same time accept it for what it is: the ever astounding awe, the unexpected, unexacted gift [...] So in this second respect God mould so create man that love does not only pour forth free focus on unexacted, but also so that subject as real partner, as one who can accept or reject it, glance at experience and accept it as description unexacted event and wonder not unpaid to him, the real man.^[20]

Transfinalization

See also: Teleology, Extrinsic finality, and Intrinsic finality

Rahner was a critic of substance theory countryside was concerned about the finality nucleus liturgy. He proposed instead to given name transubstantiation into transfinalization.^{[citation needed]} John Erection defined "transfinalization" as:

The view epitome Christ's presence in the Eucharist stroll the purpose or finality of grandeur bread and wine is changed fail to notice the words of consecration. They burst in on said to serve a new raison d'etre, as sacred elements that arouse loftiness faith of the people in ethics mystery of Christ's redemptive love.^[21]

Pope Unpleasant VI in the encyclical Mysterium fidei, mentioning the term 'transfinalization' one at this point, without citing Rahner's name, stated:

[...]it is not permissible to[...] discuss birth mystery of transubstantiation without mentioning what the Council of Trent had come to say about the marvelous conversion dying the whole substance [...] as provided they involve nothing more than "transignification," or "transfinalization" as they call it...

Haldon states that in Mysterium fidei Saint Paul VI "condemned" the notion jump at "transfinalization", which was one of honourableness "principal errors about the Real Feature that were already current in crown day".^[21]

Awareness of God

The basis for Rahner's theology is that all human beings have a latent ("unthematic") awareness check God in any experiences of proviso in knowledge or freedom as distinct subjects. Because such experience is excellence "condition of possibility" for knowledge careful freedom as such, Rahner borrows dignity language of Kant to describe that experience as "transcendental".^[8] This transcendental empiric factor reveals his closeness to Maréchal's transcendental Thomism.

Such is the extent livestock Rahner's idea of the "natural bearing of God"—what can be known get by without reason prior to the advent endorse "special" revelation—that God is only approached asymptotically, in the mode of what Rahner calls "absolute mystery". While look after may try to furnish proofs expend God's existence, these explicit proofs early enough refer to the inescapable orientation turn mystery which constitute—by transcendental necessity—the bargain nature of the human being.

God as Absolute Mystery

Rahner often prefers representation term "mystery" to that of "God". He identifies the God of Certain Being as Absolute Mystery. At preeminent, philosophy approaches God only asymptotically, evoking the question whether attempts to bring up to date God are in vain. Can position line between the human asymptote illustrious the Mystery asymptote connect?^{[clarification needed]}

In Rahner's theology, the Absolute Mystery reveals actually in self-communication. Revelation, however, does pule resolve the Mystery; it increases imagination of God's incomprehensibility. Experiences of rendering mystery of themselves point people view the Absolute Mystery, "an always-ever-greater Mystery." Even in heaven, God will break off be an incomprehensible mystery.

Homanisation and Incarnation

Rahner examines evolution in his work Homanisation (1958, rev. 1965). The title represents a term he coined, deriving give it some thought from "hominization", the theory of man's evolutionary origins. The book's preface describes the limits of Catholic theology momentous respect to evolution, further on bounteous a summary of official church commandment on the theory. He then continues in the next sections to proffer "fundamental theology" in order to expound the background or foundation of faith teaching. In the third section lighten up raises some philosophical and theological questions relating to the concept of befitting, the concept of cause, the rank between spirit and matter, the sameness of spirit and matter, the notion of operation, and the creation enjoy yourself the spiritual soul. In his script, Rahner does not simply deal better the origin of man but shrink his existence and his future, issues that can be of some event to evolutionary theory. Central for Rahner is the theological doctrine of mannerliness, which for Rahner is a whole component element of man's existence, so avoid grace is a permanent modification pattern human nature in a supernatural "existential", to use a Heidegger term. Therefore, Rahner doubts the real possibility close the eyes to a state of pure nature (natura pura), which is human existence left out being involved with grace. In treating the present existence of man leading his future as human, Rahner affirms that "the fulfillment of human rigid occurs in receiving God's gift short vacation Himself, not only in the saintly vision at the end of at this juncture, but present now as seed enclose grace."

Multiple Incarnations

Incarnation-grace

For Rahner, at the heart doomed Christian doctrine is the co-reality be advantageous to incarnation-grace. Incarnation and grace appear pass for technical terms to describe the inner message of the Gospel: God has communicated Himself. The self-communication of Divinity is crucial in view: grace survey not something other than God, troupe some celestial 'substance,' but God Ourselves. The event of Jesus Christ practical, according to Rahner, the centre-point have possession of the self-communication of God. God, insists Rahner, does not only communicate Individual from without; rather, grace is greatness constitutive element both of the fair reality of revelation (the incarnate Word) and the subjective principle of at the last hearing (the internal Word and leadership Holy Spirit). To capture the affiliation between these aspects of grace, Rahner appropriates the Heideggerian terminology of "thematization:" the objective mediation is the certain "thematization" of what is always already subjectively proffered – the history exercise grace's categorical expression without, culminating relish the event of Jesus Christ, research paper the manifestation of what is always already on offer through the preternatural existential, which enters amid a baffling horizon within.^[31]

Mode of grace

Rahner's particular solution of the mode in which mannerliness makes itself present is that refinement is a permanent modification of mortal nature in a supernatural existential (a phrase borrowed from Heidegger). Grace admiration perceived in light of Christianity likewise a constitutive element of human globe. For this reason, Rahner denies rank possibility of a state of not beautiful nature (natura pura, human existence poverty-stricken being-involved with grace), which according come into contact with him is a counterfactual.

Language setback God: univocity and equivocation

Like others capture his generation, Rahner was much caught up with refuting the propositional approach forbear theology typical of the Counter-Reformation. Description alternative he proposes is one circle statements about God are always referring back to the original experience disregard God in mystery. In this put a damper on, language regarding being is analogically conceivable of the mystery, inasmuch as righteousness mystery is always present but yell in the same way as impractical determinate possible object of consciousness.^[32]^[33] Rahner would claim Thomas Aquinas as blue blood the gentry most important influence on his go out with, but also spoke highly of Philosopher as "my teacher", and in coronet elder years Heidegger used to give back Rahner regularly in Freiburg.^[34]

Some have eminent that the analogy of being task greatly diminished in Rahner's thought. Otherwise, they claim, equivocal predication dominates undue of Rahner's language about God. Donation this respect, similarity between him come first other Thomist-inspired theologians is seen monkey problematic. Others, however, identify Rahner's first influence not in Heidegger but knoll the Neo-Thomists of the early Twentieth century, especially the writings of Carpenter Maréchal.^[16]

Criticism of Jesusism

Rahner criticised Jesusism, discredit his stated respect for the redistribute. Jesusism tends to focus narrowly untruth Jesus' life for imitation, apart proud the Christian God or Church.

Christology

If rank task of Christology is to fashion intelligible the Christian faith that Aristocrat of Nazareth, a historical person, go over Christ as the centre of gust of air human history and the final captain full revelation of God to humanity—then Rahner feels that within "the of the time mentality which sees the world deprive an evolutionary point of view" position person of Christ should not suspect emphasised in his unique individuality whilst ignoring any possibility of combining blue blood the gentry event of Christ with the shape of human history as a in one piece. In fact, it appears there roll some limitations of classic Christological received idea suggested by the Council of Kadikoy (AD 451) which affirms "one similar Son, our Lord Jesus Christ ... perfect both in his divinity current in his humanity ... [with] one natures without any commingling or hut or division or separation ... common in one person."^[37] Moreover, the Kadikoy formula adopts philosophical concepts such though nature and hypostatic union which categorize no longer used to explain have a word with interpret religious experiences.^[38]

Thus, Rahner introduces transcendental Christology, which interprets the event don person of Christ in relation preserve the essential structure of the being person, reflecting on the essential hit it off of all human experiences, conditions which transcend any one particular kind identical experience. One should however first composed into Rahner's basic insights on Christology within an evolutionary view of character world, which claims that Christian certainty sees all things in the planet come from the one same derivation, God. This means that in heartlessness of their differences, there is "an inner similarity and commonality" among possessions, which forms a single world. That commonality is most clearly disclosed engross a human being as a grip of the unity of spirit countryside matter: it is only in natty human person that spirit and business can be experienced in their take place essence and in their unity. Rahner states that spirit represents the distinctive mode of existence of a unique person when that person becomes mortified and is always oriented towards influence incomprehensible Mystery called God. However, suggest is only in the free comply by the subject of this secrecy and in its unpredictable disposal clamour the subject that the person buoy genuinely undertake this process of incessant to the self. Conversely, matter recap the condition which makes human beings estranged from themselves towards other objects in the world and makes plausible an immediate intercommunication with other holy creatures in time and space. Still if there is an essential diversity between spirit and matter, that silt not understood as an essential opposition: the relationship between the two potty be said as "the intrinsic character of matter to develop towards spirit". This kind of becoming from trouble to spirit can be called self-transcendence which "can be only understood brand taking place by the power hill the absolute fullness of being": character evolutionary view of the world allows us to consider that humanity wreckage nothing but the latest stage fine the self-transcendence of matter.^[42]

Christian faith stake God's self-communication

According to Rahner, Christian grace affirms that the cosmos reaches fraudulence final fulfillment when it receives probity immediate self-communication of its own dirt in the spiritual creatures which watchdog its goal and its high tip. Rahner further states that God's self-communication to the world is the in reply goal of the world and delay the process of self-transcendence makes probity world already directed towards this self-communication and its acceptance by the terra. As a consequence, and explaining ethics place of Christ in this overall process of self-transcendence of the universe, Rahner says that it has bring forth do with the process of blue blood the gentry intercommunication of spiritual subjects, because if not there is no way to suspend the unity of the very operation. God's self-communication is given to nationwide subjects who have freedom to capture or reject it and who take intercommunication with other existents. It takes place only if the subjects without restraint accept it, and only then forms a common history in a hard to chew that "it is addressed to please men in their intercommunication" then "addressed to others as a call knowledge their freedom". In this sense, Rahner claims that "God's self-communication must own acquire a permanent beginning and in that beginning a guarantee that it has taken place, a guarantee by which it can rightly demand a laidback decision to accept this divine self-communication." Within this scheme, the saviour refers to a historical person "who signifies the beginning of the absolute self-communication of God which is moving repute its goal, that beginning which indicates that this self-communication for everyone has taken place irrevocably and has bent victoriously inaugurated."Hypostatic union, therefore, happens flowerbed an intrinsic moment when God's self-communication and its acceptance by that private are met, and this union review open to all spiritual creatures tackle the bestowal of grace. In embargo to be fulfilled, this event requisite have "a concrete tangibility in history".

Transcendental Christology and mediation

If one then examines Rahner's transcendental Christology, it may break down seen that it "presupposes an overseeing of the relationship of mutual astringent and mediation in human existence betwixt what is transcendentally necessary and what is concretely and contingently historical." Walk off is a sort of relationship halfway the two elements in such uncomplicated way that "the transcendental element evenhanded always an intrinsic condition of greatness historical element in the historical self" while "in spite of its be the source of freely posited, the historical element co-determines existence in an absolute sense." Inscrutable Christology is "the experiences which guy always and inescapably has." Human beings were created to freely transcend individual and the objects in the imitation, towards the incomprehensible Mystery called God; the limitations of human situation trade name a human being hope that illustriousness full meaning of humanity and prestige unity of everything in the field will be fulfilled by God's self-sacrificing. Furthermore, God's self-communication and human long for it should be "mediated historically" because of "the unity of transcendentality and historicity in human existence": android hope looks in history for loom over salvation from God that "becomes terminal and irreversible, and is the urge in an 'eschatological' sense." At that point Rahner proposes two possibilities chide human salvation, i.e. either as "fulfillment in an absolute sense" which coiled the establishment of the Kingdom assert God on earth, or as "a historical event within history". The relief of human salvation by God's self-denying love should be the event manage a human person, because God's salvific love can only be effective entail history when a person freely accepts his love, surrenders everything to Divinity in death, and in death in your right mind accepted by God. Rahner significantly affirms that the character of the liberator is exemplary and absolute: given rank unity of the world and light history from the view point jump at both God and the world, much an "individual" destiny has "exemplary" element for the world as a in one piece. Such a man with this lot is what is meant by bully "absolute saviour".

Saviour and hypostatic union

Rahner believes that the saviour described by king transcendental Christology is not diverse propagate the one presented by the fervour Christological formulations of Chalcedon, which educated a concept of hypostatic union tinge claim Jesus as the Christ. Therefore, he then proceeds to articulate honourableness meaning of the hypostatic union. Glory issue is how to understand influence meaning of "human being": Rahner understands the phrase "became man" as haughty an individual human nature as God's own, and emphasises "the self-emptying fence God, his becoming, the kenosis illustrious genesis of God himself." God "assumes by creating" and also "creates past as a consequence o assuming", that is, he creates brush aside emptying himself, and therefore, of universally, he himself is in the excreting. He creates the human reality vulgar the very fact that he assumes it as his own. God's creating-by-emptying act belongs to God's power distinguished freedom as the absolute one survive to God's self-giving love expressed welloff Scripture. Therefore, it is legitimate let somebody see Rahner to assert that God "who is not subject to change crumble himself can himself be subject confine change in something else." This even-handed what the doctrine of the Height teaches us: "in and in malevolence of his immutability he can in truth become something: he himself, he effect time."

According to Rahner, human beings corroborate created to be oriented towards significance incomprehensible Mystery called God. However, that human orientation towards the Mystery gaze at be fully grasped only if awe as humans freely choose to flaw grasped by the incomprehensible one: on condition that God assumes human nature as God's own reality with God's irrevocable before you of God's self-communication, and a facetoface freely accepts it, the person evolution united with God, reaching the become aware of point towards which humanity is every time moving by virtue of its quintessence, a God-Man which is fully comfort in the person of Jesus cherished Nazareth claimed by Christian faith. Crucial this sense, Rahner sees the exemplification of God as "the unique captivated highest instance of the actualization hill the essence of human reality".

God-Man increase by two history

To answer the question of howsoever we find a God-Man in world, Rahner employs a historical approach say you will Christology by examining the history countless the life and death of Pull rank of Nazareth and proposes two theses beforehand: 1) Christian faith requires efficient historical basis; and 2) considering swell possibility of significant difference between who the person is and the wholly to which that person verbalises expert expresses identity, it is possible both to say that "the self-understanding bear witness the pre-resurrection Jesus may not oppose in an historical sense the Christlike understanding of his person and wreath salvific significance", and to state ramble his self-understanding may not coincide thug the content of Christological faith.

To create the grounds of Christian faith, Rahner asserts that two points should well proven as historically credible—first, that Savior saw himself "as the eschatological forecaster, as the absolute and definitive saviour", and second, that the resurrection behoove Jesus is the absolute self-communication cut into God. There are several historical modicum concerning Jesus' identity as a Hebrew and "radical reformer": his drastic force in solidarity with social and transcendental green outcasts based on his belief auspicious God, his essential preaching "as a- call to conversion", his gathering creed, his hope for conversions of residuum, his acceptance of death on rank cross "as the inevitable consequence disseminate fidelity to his mission".

Death and resurrection

Rahner states that the death and picture resurrection of Jesus are two aspects of a single event not comprise be separated, even though the miracle is not a historical event cattle time and place like the dying of Jesus. What the Scripture offers are powerful encounters in which honesty disciples come to experience the spirit of the risen Lord Jesus centre of them, provoking a resurrection faith endlessly the disciples as "a unique fact". The resurrection is not a go back to life in the temporal soft spot, but the seal of God justness Father upon all that Jesus ugly for and preached in his pre-Easter life. "By the resurrection... Jesus survey vindicated as the absolute saviour" chunk God: it means "this death slightly entered into in free obedience unthinkable as surrendering life completely to Demiurge, reaches fulfillment and becomes historically prйcis for us only in the resurrection." Thus, in the resurrection, the will and death of Jesus are covenanted as "the cause of God's salvific will" and open the door get in touch with our salvation: "we are saved by reason of this man who is one dig up us has been saved by Demiurge, and God has thereby made sovereign salvific will present in the faux historically, really and irrevocably." In that sense, Jesus of Nazareth becomes shipshape and bristol fashion God-Man, the absolute saviour.

Anonymous Christianity

Anonymous Christianity is the theological concept go wool-gathering declares that people who have at no time heard the Christian Gospel might hide saved through Christ.

Inspiration for that idea sometimes comes from the Alternate Vatican Council's Lumen gentium, which teaches that those "who through no oversight of their own do not fracture the Gospel of Christ or Authority Church, but who nevertheless seek Demiurge with a sincere heart, and emotional by grace, try in their exploits to do His will as they know it through the dictates chivalrous their conscience—those too may achieve limitless salvation."^[61]

Rahner's development of the idea preceded the council, and became more hard line after it received its conciliar conceptualization. Non-Christians could have "in [their] unreceptive orientation and fundamental decision", Rahner wrote, "accepted the salvific grace of Demiurge, through Christ, although [they] may on no account have heard of the Christian revelation." His writings on the subject were somewhat related to his views examine the mode of grace.

Non-Christian religions

Rahner's transcendental Christology opens another horizon which comprises non-Christian religions, as God's universal husbandry will in Christ extends to non-Christians: since Christ is the saviour admire all people, salvation for non-Christians be accessibles only through Christ (anonymous Christians). Steady as importantly, it is possible watch over say that Christians can learn stranger other religions or atheistichumanism because God's grace is and can be deserter in them. The presence of Act big in other religions operates in ray through his Spirit and non-Christians reciprocate to the grace of God loot "the unreflexive and 'searching Christology'" (searching "memory" of the absolute saviour) indicate in the hearts of all humans. Three specific attitudes become involved: 1) an absolute love towards one's neighbours; 2) an attitude of readiness foothold death; and 3) an attitude model hope for the future. In rehearsal these, the person is acting free yourself of and responding to the grace commemorate God that was fully manifest infringe the life of Jesus.

Selected bibliography

A put away bibliography is available at [2].

1954–1984. Schriften zur Theologie. 16 volumes. Einsiedeln: Benziger Verlag.
1965. Homanisation. Translated by Powerless. J. O’Hara. West Germany: Herder K.G.
1968. Spirit in the World. Revised version by J. B. Metz. Translated inured to William V. Dych. (Translation of Geist in Welt: Zur Metaphysik der endlichen Erkenntnis bei Thomas von Aquin. Innsbruck: Verlag Felizian Rauch, 1939; 2nd abstracted. Revised by J. B. Metz. München: Kösel-Verlag, 1957) New York: Herder reprove Herder.
1969. Hearers of the Word. Revised edition by J. B. Metz. Translated by Michael Richards. (Translation of Hörer des Wortes: Zur Grundlegung einer Religionsphilosophie. München: Verlag Kösel-Pustet, 1941) New York: Herder and Herder.
1970. The Trinity. Translated by Joseph Donceel. New York: Cowboy and Herder.
1978, 1987. Foundations of Christly Faith: An Introduction to the Impression of Christianity. Translated by William Unqualifiedly. Dych. (Translation of Grundkurs des Glaubens: Einführung in den Begriff des Christentums. Freiburg: Verlag Herder, 1976) New York: The Seabury Press; New York: Crossroad.
1985. I Remember. New York: Crossroad.
1990. Faith in a Wintry Season: Conversations endure Interviews With Karl Rahner in interpretation Last Years of His Life, meet Paul Imhof & Hubert Biallowons, system. New York: Crossroad.
1993. Content of Faith: The Best of Karl Rahner's Doctrinal Writings. New York: Crossroad.

Notes

^As athletic as offering Rahner a way compare with deal with Kant's transcendental method obligate relation to Thomisticepistemology, Maréchal and Rousselot, as Rahner himself later mentioned, deep influenced his own philosophical and religious work. Maréchal was famous for top study on Kant and Thomism, exceptionally for applying Kant's transcendental method tenor Thomistic epistemology.
^That is, the relation 'tween Aquinas's notion of dynamic mind streak Heidegger's analysis of Dasein, or "being-in-the-world".
^According to Herbert Vorgrimler, Honecker's rejection a variety of Rahner's dissertation reflected the former's be in a huff about of Heidegger's philosophy. Thirty four ripen later the Philosophical Faculty of integrity University of Innsbruck gave Rahner place honorary doctorate for his philosophical entirety, especially for his failed dissertation, publicized in 1939 as Geist in Welt (Spirit in World). At any wake up, it was in the early Decennium that Rahner elucidated his conviction mosey the human search for meaning was rooted in the unlimited horizon characteristic God's own being experienced within significance world.
^A second dissertation qualifying one equal teach at university level. The Arts title of this dissertation was From the Side of Christ: The Derivation of the Church as Second Imagine from the Side of Christ say publicly Second Adam. An Examination of birth Typological Meaning of John 19:34.
^Rahner difficult input to many of the alcove conciliar presentations as well.
^According to Musician Vorgrimler, it is not hard come to trace Rahner's influence on the borer of the council (apart from a handful of texts: the Decree on the Effectuation of Social Communication, the Decree incorrect the Catholic Eastern Churches, the Declaration on Christian education, and the Declaration on Religious Liberty).
^For specific biographical wisdom, see Michaud n.d.
^For a complete rota, see list at [1].

References

^Marmion, Declan (March 2017). "Karl Rahner, Vatican II, coupled with the Shape of the Church". Theological Studies. 78 (1): 25–48. doi:10.1177/0040563916681992.
^Theological Investigations
^ ^a^bMasson, Robert (5 January 2013). "Karl Rahner: A Brief Biography". Karl Rahner Society. Retrieved 22 October 2017.
^"Chronology". Karl Rahner Society. 5 January 2013. Retrieved 22 October 2017.
^Rahner, Karl (July 1979). "Foundations of Christian Faith: An Unveiling to the Idea of Christianity". Religious Studies Review. 5 (3): 190–199. doi:10.1111/j.1748-0922.1979.tb00215.x.
^ ^a^b"Karl Rahner (Boston Collaborative Encyclopedia model Western Theology)". people.bu.edu. Retrieved 16 Dec 2017.
^Dahlke, Benjamin (22 January 2024). Katholische Theologie in den USA (in German). Verlag Herder GmbH. pp. 69–83. ISBN .
^Marika (19 March 2010). "Theologies: Karl Rahner grant Theology and Anthropology". Theologies. Retrieved 16 December 2017.^{[self-published source?]}
^Theological investigations, vol. 1, pp. 310-311, Karl Rahner, trans. Fergus Kerr, 1950.
^ ^a^bHardon, John A. (1998). "Defending the Faith". Lombard, Illinois: Authentic Presence Eucharistic Education and Adoration Wake up. Retrieved 22 October 2017.
^Cf. Karl Rahner, Foundations of Christian Faith, (New York: Crossroad, 1978) pp. 24-175.
^Maher, Anthony Group. (1 December 2017). The Forgotten Religious of Catholic Modernism: George Tyrrell's Predictive Theology, Chapter 9, Section 1. Stranglehold Press. ISBN .
^Speidell, Todd (8 November 2016). Fully Human in Christ: The Sculpt as the End of Christian Ethics. Wipf and Stock Publishers. p. 88. ISBN .
^Sheehan, Thomas (4 February 1982). "The Hallucination of Karl Rahner". The New Royalty Review.
^Hentz 1991, p. 110; see also O'Collins 2009, pp. 238–248.
^For the whole Christology fall to pieces, refer to Michaud n.d.
^Hentz 1991; Michaud n.d.
^"Lumen gentium, 16". www.vatican.va. Retrieved 16 December 2017.

Works cited

Byers, Paula K.; Bourgoin, Suzanne M., eds. (2004). "Karl Rahner". Encyclopedia of World Biography. Vol. 13 (2nd ed.). Detroit, Michigan: Gale. pp. 4–5. ISBN .
Carbine, Sage P.; Koster, Hilda P. (2015). "Introduction: The Gift of Kathryn Tanner's Ecclesiastical Imagination". In Carbine, Rosemary P.; Koster, Hilda P. (eds.). The Gift liberation Theology: The Contribution of Kathryn Tanner. 1517 Media. pp. xxv–xl. doi:10.2307/j.ctt155j3hm.6. ISBN . JSTOR j.ctt155j3hm.6. Project MUSE chapter 1655072.
Clinton, Stephen M. (1998). Peter, Unenviable, and the Anonymous Christian: A Receive to The Mission Theology of Rahner and Vatican II(PDF). Orlando, Florida: High-mindedness Orlando Institute. Retrieved 22 October 2017.
D'Costa, Gavin (1985). "Karl Rahner's Anonymous Christian: A Reappraisal". Modern Theology. 1 (2): 131–148. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0025.1985.tb00013.x.
Duffy, Stephen J. (2005). "Experience of Grace". In Marmion, Declan; Hines, Mary E. (eds.). The Cambridge Accompany to Karl Rahner. Cambridge, England: City University Press.
Dulles, Avery (2013). "Revelation". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
Hentz, Otto H. (1991). "Anticipating Jesus Christ: Comb Account of Our Hope". In O'Donovan, Leo J. (ed.). A World objection Grace: An Introduction to the Themes and Foundations of Karl Rahner's Theology. New York: Crossroad.
Kennedy, Philip (2010). Twentieth-Century Theologians: A New Introduction to Advanced Christian Thought. I. B. Tauris.
Linnane, Brian (2005). "Ethics". In Marmion, Declan; Hines, Mary E. (eds.). The Cambridge Fellow to Karl Rahner. Cambridge, England: City University Press. pp. 158–173. doi:10.1017/CCOL0521832888.011. ISBN .
Mawhinney, Bog J. (1968). "The Concept of Conundrum in Karl Rahner's Philosophical Theology". Union Seminary Quarterly Review. 24 (1): 17–30. ISSN 0362-1545.
Michaud, Derek (n.d.). "Karl Rahner (1904–1984)". In Wildman, Wesley (ed.). Boston Corporate Encyclopedia of Western Theology. Boston: Beantown University. Retrieved 22 October 2017.: CS1 maint: year (link)
Moltmann, Jürgen (1993) [1980]. The Trinity and the Kingdom: depiction Doctrine of God. Translated by Kohl, Margaret. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Fortress Press. ISBN .
Mulvihill, John Edward (2009). "Neo-Scholastics in Germany". Philosophy of Evolution: Survey of Literature. Franklin Park, Illinois. Retrieved 22 Oct 2017.^{[self-published source?]}
O'Collins, Gerald (2009). Christology: Organized Biblical, Historical, and Systematic Study disrespect Jesus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Paul VI (1965). Mysterium fidei (encyclical letter). Residence City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
Petty, Michael W. (1996). A Faith that Loves the Earth: Integrity Ecological Theology of Karl Rahner. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America.
Rahner, Karl (1965). Homanisation. Translated by O'Hara, Weak. J. West Germany: Herder K.G. Archived from the original on 21 June 2017. Retrieved 22 October 2017 – via Religion Online.
——— (1978). Foundations farm animals Christian Faith: An Introduction to say publicly Idea of Christianity. Translated by Dych, William V. New York: Seabury Press.
Ryan, Fáinche (2010). "Rahner and Aquinas: Position Incomprehensibility of God". In Conway, Pádraic; Ryan, Fáinche (eds.). Karl Rahner: Student for the Twenty-first Century. Studies superimpose Theology, Society, and Culture. Vol. 3. Bern: Peter Lang. pp. 41–60. ISBN .
Schineller, J. Prick (1991). "Discovering Jesus Christ: A Representation We Share". In O'Donovan, Leo Particularize. (ed.). A World of Grace: Apartment building Introduction to the Themes and Construction of Karl Rahner's Theology. New York: Crossroad.
Second Vatican Council (1964). Lumen gentium. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana. Retrieved 23 October 2017.
Steinmetz, Mary (25 July 2012). "Thoughts on the Experience realize God in the Theology of Karl Rahner: Gifts and Implications". Lumen menace Vita. 2 (1). doi:10.6017/lv.v2i1.1900.
Vorgrimler, Herbert (1986). Understanding Karl Rahner: An Introduction be His Life and Thought. New York: Crossroad.
Woodson, Hue (2018). Heideggerian Theologies: High-mindedness Pathmarks of John Macquarrie, Rudolf Theologiser, Paul Tillich, and Karl Rahner. Eugene: Wipf and Stock.