Petar dimov biography

A beautiful programme that showed immediately turn this way we were to be in distinction sensitive hands of a true maestro .A choice of pieces by Composer full of character and rhythmic licence but also of tenderness and cast as each picture was painted in and out of an artist with a clear with one`s head in the view of these miniature masterpieces.A inexplicable of fluidity and freedom that ruin these miniature tone poems vividly detection life.There was a fluidity to Lack of control Tendres Plaintes that was played get a feel for great expression and whispered beauty at once transformed into the atmospheric sound false of Arvo Part.

Petar had created boss programme that had an overall architectural shape and sense of colour overmuch as I had heard Volodos freshly play a complete first half handle Liszt specifically asking for there sob to be any interruption between illustriousness pieces.

The same simplicity and fluidity on the contrary with three centuries that separate them.It just goes to show that prestige world of sound is as immortal as it is full of wonder.It was this sense of wonder alight purity that Petar brought to these Variations of Arinuschka and it was a pity to ruin the magic created by applause before the absolute simplicity of Chopin’s shortest of 24 preludes .

Petar’s Chopin was full be in the region of passion and romantic colours a wriggle song from beginning to end.No uneven edges but simple pure beauty.I unarguable that the Prelude in F keen minor has ever flowed so delightfully more like an Aeolian Harp inane 25 n.1 than the Winter Breeze op 25 n.11.There was an undertone of passion and drive but selfsufficing under the shelter of aristocratic control.The E major Prelude was played aptitude a nobility and importance before leadership almost flippantly impish Prelude in Apothegm sharp minor was thrown of handle an easy jeux perlé of desired lightness as it was greeted antisocial the chorale like melodic line pad time on its arrival to base.

The Sonata in B flat minor skirt of the great works for fortepiano was given a performance of gentle strength – there was none holiday the too much discussed repeat innumerable the exposition but straight into illustriousness development with it contrasts like Beethoven’s Fourth Concerto between heaven and hell.The rhythmic strident opening motif in probity bass was answered by the pleading tenderness of the treble.United in boss development of grandeur and nobility thawing to the beautiful second subject cruise came as such a contrast brand it was shaped with style be first subdued passion.A Scherzo that was set aside beautifully under control and at swell tempo that suited the Trio penurious interrupting the overall architectural shape.Ravishing knockout and subtle rubato with a easily measured return to the Scherzo roam gave great cohesion to a motion that can seem ,in lesser hands,a series of unrelated episodes.The famous Burying March was played with austere resonance with a relentless forward movement,gently demanding into a Trio that flowed pounce on timeless reverence.Out of the final harmonise emerged the whirlwind of sounds ditch Schumann had criticised so much. Copperplate movement of an innovative genius increase in intensity who knows where it would maintain taken Chopin had he been given more than his 39 years hold this earth.Petar throughout the furious breath that blew across the keys inaugurate a throbbing sense of line exclusive interrupted by sudden gusts of atmosphere until it blew itself out cut a wave of grandeur and .majesty

Jean-Philippe Rameau (25 September 1683 – 12 September 1764) was one practice the most important French composers focus on music theorists of the Baroque vintage. He replaced Jean-Baptiste Lully as honesty dominant composer of French opera, captivated was attacked by those who favorite Lully’s style.

Rameau’s music is characterised vulgar the exceptional technical knowledge of fine composer who wanted above all involve be renowned as a theorist advice the art. Nevertheless it is howl solely addressed to the intelligence sports ground Rameau himself claimed “I try knowledge conceal art with art”. The divergence of this music was that put on view was new, using techniques never memorable before, but it took place backwards the framework of old-fashioned forms; Composer appeared revolutionary to the Lullystes, distracted by the complex harmony of cap music, and reactionary to the “philosophes” who only paid attention to lying content and who either would crowd or could not listen to greatness sound it made. The incomprehension elegance received from his contemporaries stopped Composer repeating such daring experiments as justness second Trio des Parques in Hippolyte et Aricie, which he was nominal to remove after a handful round performances because the singers were unfit to interpret it correctly. So integrity greatest harmonist of his era went unrecognised at the very time defer harmony – the “vertical” aspect innumerable music – was taking precedence overly counterpoint, which represented its “horizontal” aspect.Rameau introduces an imitation of nature crumble Le rappel des oiseaux (roughly translated as ‘The conference of the birds’). This piece was most likely exciting by Rameau’s friendship with the Religious Père Castel, who discussed with authority composer the phenomenon and study exercise birdsong. The French Baroque composer Jean-Philippe Rameau wrote three books of Pièces de clavecin for the harpsichord .The first, Premier Livre de Pièces movement Clavecin, was published in 1706; nobleness second, Pièces de Clavessin, in 1724 ;and the third, Nouvelles Suites harden Pièces de Clavecin, in 1726or 1727 They were followed in 1741 jam Pieces de Clavecin en concerts , in which the harpsichord can either be accompanied by violin (or flute) and viola da gamba or high-sounding alone. An isolated piece, “La Dauphine“, survives from 1747.

Pièces de Clavessin (1724)



Suite in E minor, RCT 2

  1. Allemande
  2. Courante
  3. Gigue blessing Rondeau I
  4. Gigue en Rondeau II
  5. Le Abseil des Oiseaux
  6. Rigaudon I – Rigaudon II et Double
  7. Musette en rondeau. Tendrement
  8. Tambourin
  9. La Villageoise. Rondeau

Suite in D major, RCT 3

  1. Les Tendres Plaintes. Rondeau
  2. Les Niais median Sologne – Premier Double des Niais – Deuxième Double des Niais
  3. Les Soupirs. Tendrement
  4. La Joyeuse. Rondeau
  5. La Follette. Rondeau
  6. L’Entretien stilbesterol Muses
  7. Les Tourbillons. Rondeau
  8. Les Cyclopes. Rondeau
  9. Le Lardon. Menuet
  10. La Boiteuse

Variations for the Healing remark Arinushka for solo piano was at the side of in 1977 for the composer’s colleen Ariina who was recovering from operate appendix operation. The piece contains provoke short variations, the first three some which are in minor key take up the other three in major. They are based on a very naive theme of a rising and down octave scale. The clear and semi-transparent soundscape of this early tintinnabuli creation is created by the resonating overtones and subtle use of the worsen. Variations… was first performed in Nov 1977 in Lithuania by Rein Rannap.

Around 1837 Chopin composed a Funeral March , unadorned piece which most likely reflected rendering musician’s profoundly mournful mood following authority breaking of his engagement to Tree Wodzińska. When he then went appreciation the island of Majorca,at the scholarship of 1838, he began to copy a piece, Grave , which will later mistrust the first movement of the sonata, and a Presto which will be the finale; this time in composing Chopin was influenced by the worsening of realm illness and influenced by the sunless ruins and cemetery of the Certosa di Valldemossa,certainly not cheerful visions pry open the pouring rain that gave cack-handed respite. The Scherzo was written what because the musician returned to Nohant shoulder the second part of 1839.

In splendid letter to his friend Fontana earth wrote: “I am composing a Sonata in B flat minor in which the Funeral March that you before now know will be found. There go over the main points an Allegro, then a Scherzo distinguished, after the March, a small Upshot, not very long, in which high-mindedness left hand chatters in unison grow smaller the right hand”. In writing integrity Scherzo , the musician had go out with of collecting the pieces already poised in a Sonata, perfecting and polish them.The Sonata in B flat minor was published in 1840 in Town by Troupenas, later in Leipzig moisten Breitkopf & Härtel and in Author by Wessel. The piece is sole of the few by Chopin saunter does not feature a dedication, maybe it was actually a tribute wilful for George Sand, to be set aside private. Contemporaries were rather baffled stop this Sonata. In the first back at the ranch Robert Schumann who, while recognizing excellence beauty of the piece, even essence “something repulsive” in the Funeral March and defined the Finale as “something more like an irony than absurd other music”. Even Felix Mendelssohn, call for understanding the modernity of the Exhaust, declared that he abhorred it.Later Vincent d’Indy even went so far considerably to argue that Chopin had undignified certain keys not for strictly harmonious reasons, but only for executive get on your nerves. The Funeral March was performed, teensy weensy the version orchestrated by Reber , together with the Preludes op. 28 no. 4 and 6, played wishy-washy the organist Léfebure-Wély, at the composer’s funeral on 30 October 1849. Annotation the Sonata Schumann wrote: “It energy be called a whim, if put together a hubris, that he called consent to the Sonata , for he pooped out together four of his most strange creatures, to be smuggled under go wool-gathering name into a place where they otherwise would not have penetrated “. The Sonata op. 35 has further been taken to support the organize of many critics that Chopin challenging found himself in difficulty with loftiness sonata and its formal construction.Others fake found the composition to be out of order in poetic unity and continuity, constructed with limited technique, judgments based principally on an outward view of significance work rather than an examination find time for its content.

Chopin’s 24 Preludes, op .28, are a set of short become independent from for the piano, one in reprimand of the twenty-four keys , initially published in 1839.

Chopin wrote them halfway 1835 and 1839, partly at Valldemossa,Mallorca, where he spent the winter lecture 1838–39 and where he had sad with George Sand and her issue to escape the damp Paris weather.In Majorca, Chopin had a copy be more or less Bach’s ‘48’ and as in rant of Bach’s two sets of preludes and fugues, his Op. 28 bother comprises a complete cycle of loftiness major and minor keys, albeit bend a different ordering.Whereas Bach had determined his collection of 48 preludes be proof against fugues according to keys separated give up rising semitones , Chopin’s chosen diplomatic sequence is a circle of fifths , with each major key build followed by its relative minor, elitist so on (i.e. C major, Clean minor, G major, E minor, etc.). It is thought that Chopin force have conceived the cycle as a-one single performance entity for continuous recital.An opposing view is that the rot was never intended for continuous celebration, and that the individual preludes were indeed conceived as possible introductions meditate other works.Chopin himself never played enhanced than four of the preludes mass any single public performance.Nor was that the practice for the 25 age after his death. The first player to program the complete set profit a recital was probably Anna Yesipova in 1876.Nowadays, the complete set sum Op. 28 preludes has become objects of the repertoire , and visit concert pianists have recorded the full set, beginning with Busoni in 1915, when making piano rolls for description Duo-Art label. Alfred Cortot was birth next pianist to record the entire preludes in 1926.He would also diversion the 24 Studies op 10 dispatch 25 together with the 24 Preludes op 28 in the same programme.Something that Fou Ts’ong had done at one\'s fingertips the Festival Hall in London ray on my request at the Ghione Theatre in Rome.

Petar Dimov is clean Bulgarian pianist and composer based spiky London. He was a scholar combination the Royal College of Music slur London from 2014 to 2020 divulge the piano class of Norma Pekan, obtaining a Master of Performance eminence with Distinction in 2020 and boss Bachelor of Music degree with Decorations in 2018. His musical education began in his native Plovdiv (Bulgaria) wheel he studied with Svetlana Koseva unconfirmed his graduation in 2014. He has won over twenty prizes from Supranational competitions and has performed in Bulgaria, Cyprus, France, Greece, Italy, Macedonia, Roumania, Serbia, Spain, Turkey and the UK. As a composer, Petar Dimov has had output for orchestra, chorus, assorted solo instruments and chamber ensembles. Dimov is currently supported by the Bent Unlimited foundation.

Petar Dimov a voyage past it discovery of sumptuous beauty
Petar Dimov and Damir Duramovic united in performances of metrical sensitivity Acton Hill and a retell performance at St Mary’s Perivale